University of Groningen
Onderwijsontwerp als conversatie van Kruiningen, Jacqueline F.
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date: 2010 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA): van Kruiningen, J. F. (2010). Onderwijsontwerp als conversatie: probleemoplossing in interprofessioneel overleg Groningen: s.n.
Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Download date: 12-12-2018
Bibliografie Akkerman, S. F. (2006). Strangers in dialogue. Academic collaboration across organizational bounderies. Utrecht: IVLOS. Alexander, P. A. (2000). Toward a model of academic development: schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Educational Researcher 29(2): p. 28-33. Algeo, H. (2006). British or American English? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Antoniou, P., Creemers, B. P. M. & Kyriakides, L. (2009). Integrating research on teacher education and educational effectiveness: using the dynamic model for teacher professional development. In: M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (red.) Transformative leaderschip and educational excellence. Learning organizations in the information age (p. 1-34). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Atkinson, P. (1999). Medical discourse, evidentiality and the construction of professional responsibility. In: S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (red.) Talk, work and institutional order (p. 75-108). Den Haag: Mouton de Gruyter. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bamberg, M. (2004). Narrative discourse and identities. In: J. C. Meister, T. Kindt, W. Schernus & M. Stein (red.) Narratology beyond literary criticism (p. 213-237). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. Barzelay, M. (1993). The single case study as intellectually ambitious inquiry. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3(3): p. 305-318. Bax, M. M. H. (1995). Een spiegel van de geest. Over taal, communicatie en cognitie. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff. Bazerman, Ch. (1981). What written knowledge does: three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: p. 361-387. Bazerman, Ch. & Russel, D. R. (1994). Landmark essays on writing across the curriculum. Davis: Hermagoras press. Bazerman, Ch. & Russel, D. R. (1994). Writing across the curriculum as a challenge to rhetoric and composition. In: Ch. Bazerman & D. R. Russel (red.) Landmark essays on writing across the curriculum (p. xi-xvi). Davis: Hermagora press. Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R. & Maxim, J. (2007). Individual variation in agrammatism: a single case study of the influence of interaction. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 42(6): p. 629-647. Beijaard, D., Verloop, N. & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers' perceptions of professional identity: an exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education 16: p. 749-764. Beijaard, D. (2002). Veranderingen en accenten in het onderzoek naar leren van docenten: inleiding op het themanummer. Pedagogische Studieën 79(4): p. 243-250. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C. & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education 20: p. 107-128. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., Morine-Dershimer, G. & Tillema, H. (2005). Trends and themes in teachers' working and learning environment. In: D. Beijaard, P. C. Meijer, G.
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Morine-Dershimer & H. Tillema (red.) Teacher professional development in changing conditions (p. 9-23). Dordrecht: Springer. Beijaard, D., Korthagen, F. & Verloop, N. (2007). Understanding how teachers learn as a prerequisite for promoting teacher learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 13(2): p. 105-108. Ben-Peretz, M. & Kupferberg, I. (2007). Does teachers' negotiation of personal cases in an interactive cyber forum contribute to their professional learning? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 13(2): p. 125-143. Bereiter, C. & Scaramalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, Ney Jersey, Londen: Lawrence Erlsbaum Associates. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1992). Cognition and curriculum. In: P. Jackson (red.) Handbook of research on curriculum (p. 517-542). New York: Macmillian. Berenst, J. (1994). Relationeel taalgebruik. Conversationele strategieën in interpersonele en interculturele communicatie. Amsterdam: Thesis publishers. Berenst, J., Koole, T. & Hajer, M. (2001). Leerlingcategoriseringen en klasse-interactie. Tijdschrift Voor Taalbeheersing 23: p. 178-198. Berenst, J. (2003a). Situationeel taalgebruik en de ontwikkeling van pragmatische vaardigheden. In: T. Koole, J. Nortier & B. Tahitu (red.) Artikelen van de Vierde Socio-Linguistische conferentie (p. 55-67). Delft: Eburon. Berenst, J. (2003b). Begripsbewaking in gesprekken met kleuters. In: Waes.L., P. Cuvelier & I. De Ridder (red.) Studies in Taalbeheersing (p. 23-34). Assen: Van Gorcum. Berenst, J., Kwant, A. & Glopper, K. d. (2007). Leerzame gesprekken. Interacties met kleuters tijdens voorleessessies. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen (78): p. 85-94. Berenst, J. (2009). Dialogisch leren: een uitdaging voor gespreksanalytisch onderzoek. In: A. Backus, M. Keijzer, I. Vedder & B. Weltens (red.) Artikelen van de zesde Anélaconferentie (p. 22-39). Delft: Eburon. Billet, S. (1996). Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorising. Learning and Instruction 6(3): p. 263-280. Billet, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: re-conceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction 11: p. 431-452. Blackwell, R. & Blackmore, P. (2003). Towards strategic staff development in higher education. Maidenhead: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. Boden, D. & Zimmerman, D. H. (1991). Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Burkeley: University of California. Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk. Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher 33(8): p. 3-15. Brouwer, C. E. & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics (1): p. 29-47. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In: E. N. Goody (red.) Questions and politeness. Strategies in social interaction (p. 56289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Button, G. & Sharrok, W. (2000). Design by problem solving. In: P. Luft, J. Hindmarsh & C. Heath (red.) Workplace studies. Recovering workpractice and informing system design (p. 46-67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 5(1): p. 43-51. 234
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Calderhead, J. (1996). Techers: beliefs and knowledge. In: C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (red.) Handbook of educational psychology (p. 709-725). New York: Macmillian. Carroll, D. (2005). Learning through interactive talk: a school-based mentor teacher study group as a context for professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education 21: p. 457-473. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse. In: M. C. Wittrock (red.) Handbook of research on teaching (p. 432-463). New York: Macmillan. Clandinin, D.J. (1986). Classroom practie: teacher images in action. Philadelphia: Falmer Press. Clandlin, Ch. N., Maley, Y. & Sutch, H. (1999). Industrial instability and the discourse of enterprise bargaining. In: S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (red.) Talk, work and institutional order. Discourse in medical, mediation and managment settings (p. 232-350). Berlijn, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Clark, C. M. (1992). Teachers as designers in self-directed professional development. In: A. Hargreaves & M. G. Fullan (red.) Understanding teacher development (p. 75-85). New York: Teachers College press. Clark, C. M. (2001). Talking shop. Authentic conversation and teacher learning. New York: Teachers College Press. Clark, H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond certainty: taking an inquiry stance on practice. In: A. Lieberman & L. Miller (red.) Teachers caught in the action. Professional development that matters (p. 45-58). New York, London: Teachers College Press. Corte, E. de. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction 10: p. 249-266. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). The prosody of repetition: on quoting and mimicy. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (red.) Prosody in conversation (p. 366-405). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crespo, S. (2006). Elementary teacher talk in mathematics study groups. Educational Studies in Mathematics 63: p. 29-56. Derks, T. (2007). Simeon ten Holt: "Het gaat mij om een sociaal proces". (Interview). http://www.simeontenholt.com (downloaddatum: 25-06-2007). Dijk, T. A. van (1980). Macrostructures. An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Dolk, M. (1997). Onmiddelijk onderwijsgedrag over denken en handelen van leraren in onmiddelijke onderwijssituaties. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht. Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examiniation: The case of a trial for rape. In: P. Drew & J. Heritage (red.) Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (p. 470-520). Cambridge: Cambrigde university press. Drew, P. (2003). Comparative analysis of talk-in -interaction in different institutional settings: a sketch. In: Ph. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron & J. Mandelbaum (red.) Studies in language and social interaction (p. 293-308). Mahwah, New Jersy, London: Lwarence Erlbaum Associates. Driel, J. H. v., Bulte, A. M. W. & Verloop, N. (2007). The relationship between teachers' general belief about teaching and learning and their domain specific curriculum beliefs. Learning and Instruction 17(2): p. 156-172.
235
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In: R. Englebretson (red.) Stancetaking in discourse (p. 139-182). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Duszak, A. (1997). (Re)orientation strategies in academic discourse. In: E. M. Jakobs & D. Knorr (red.) Scheiben in den Wissenschaften (p. 63-75). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Dysthe, O. (2001). The mutual challange of writing research and the teaching of writing. Keynote op de eerste conferentie van de EATAW, de European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing, gehouden te Groningen, 18-20 juni 2001. Ongepubliceerd. Edwards, D. & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. The development of understanding in the classroom. Londen, New York: Methuen. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage. Edwards, D. (1998). The relevant thing about her: social identity categories in use. In: Ch. S. W. Antaki (red.) Identities in talk (p. 15-33). Londen: Sage publications. Eemeren, F. H. v. & Grootendorst, R. (1982). The speech acts of arguing and convincing in externalized discussions. Journal of Pragmitics 6: p. 1-24. Ehlich, K. & Rehbein, J. (1986). Muster und Institution; Untersuchungen zur schulischen Kommunikation. Tubingen: Gunter Narr. Ehlich, K., Rehbein, J. & Thije, J. D. ten (red). (1993). Kennis, taal en handelen. Assen: Van Gorcum. Elbaz, F. (1991). Research on teachers' knowledge: the evolution of a discourse. Journal of Curriulum Studies 23: p. 1-19. Enfield, N. J. (2006). Social consequences of common ground. In: N. J. Enfield & C. Levinson (red.) Roots of human sociality (p. 399-430). Oxford (UK), New York: Berg Publishers. Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, C. (2006). Roots of human sociality. Culture, cognition and interaction. Oxford (UK), New York: Berg Publishers. Engelen, A. & Bergen, Th. (2002). Op zoek naar factoren die van coaching een krachtige leeromgeving voor docenten maken. Pedagogische Studieën 79(4): p. 305-321. Engeström, Y. & Middleton, D. (1998). Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Entwistle, N., Skinner, D., Entwistle, D. & Orr, S. (2000). Conceptions and beliefs about "good teaching": an integration of contrasting research areas. Higher Education Research & Development 19(1): p. 5-26. Erickson, F. & Schultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper. Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press. Fenwick, T. (1994). New perspectives on professionals learning: the liberation and limiting potential of dialogue. Ongepubliceerd. Ford, C. E. & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the managment of turns. In: E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (red.) Interaction and grammar (p. 134-184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A. & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Practices in the construction of turns: the 'TCU' revisited. Pragmatics 6(3): p. 427-454. Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A. & Thompson, S. A. (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In: C. Ford, B. A. Fox & S. A. Thompson (red.) The language of turn and sequence (p. 14-38). Oxford: University Press. Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education. Interaction and practice. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications. 236
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York, London: Teachers College Press. Fulwiler, T. & Young, A. (1997). Preface - The WAC archives revisited. In: K. Blake Yancey & B. Huot (red.) Assessing writing across the curriculum. Diverse approaches and practices (p. 1-6) . Greenwich, London: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk. Amsterdam, Phyladelphia: John Benjamins. Garfinkel, H. & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical concerns. In: J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (red.) Theretical Sociology. Perspectives and developments (p. 337-366). Appleton: Appleton Century Crofts. Glopper, C. M. & Berenst, J. (in voorbereiding). Cognities en interactiegedrag van vakdocenten in het VMBO: professionalisering en verandering. Ongepubliceerd. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Random House. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Golato, A. & Faygal, Z. (2008). Comparing single and double sayings of the German response token ja and the role of prosody: a conversation analytic perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3): p. 241-270. Gonzales, P. A. (1996). The talk and social organization of problem-solving activities among physicists. Ongepubliceerd. University of California, Los Angeles. Good, J., Miller, V. & Gassenheimer, C. (2003). Overhauling professional development: self-assessment conversations to initiate reform. Ongepubliceerd. Paper at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, April 2003). Goodwin, C. (2006). Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves. Text & Talk 26(4-5): p. 441-460. Goodwin, Ch. & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: p. 283-307. Goodwin, Ch. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(3): p. 233-260. Goodwin, Ch. (2008). Notes on story structure and the organizatoin of participation. In: J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (red.) Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (p. 224-235). Cambridge, Londen: Cambridge University Press. Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Inidana University Press. Greatbatch, D. & Dingwall, R. (1999). Professional neutralism in family mediation. In: S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (red.) Talk, work and institutional order (p. 271-293). Berlijn, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Greeno, J. F., Collins, A. M. & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In: D. Berliner & R. Calffe (red.) Handbook of educational psychology (p. 15-46). New York: MacMillan. Hajer, M. (1996). Leren in een tweede taal. Interactie in vakonderwijs aan een meertalige MAVO-klas. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff. Hajer, M. (1998). De bruikbaarheid van de content-based approach in de Nederlandse context. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 58: p. 210-210. Hall, G. & Danby, S. (2003). Teachers and academics co-constructing the category of expert through meeting talk. Paper presented at the Australian Association for
237
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Research in Education / New Zealand Association for Research in Education Annual Confernce. Ongepubliceerd. Hall, G. (2005). The everyday practice of partnerschip: the interactional work of participants in a school and university collaboration. Proceedings of the 333rd annual Australian Teacher Education Association Conference 2005. In: M. Cooper (red.) Teacher education. Local and global (p. 199-206). Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. G. (1992). Understanding teacher development. New York: Teachers College Press. Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. G. (1992). Introduction. In: A. Hargreaves & M. G. Fullan (red.) Understanding teacher development (p. 1-20). New York: Teachers College Press. Hargreaves, A. (1995). Renewal in the age of paradox. Educational Leadership 52(7): p. 14-19. Hativa, N. & Goodyear, P. (2002). Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Have, P. ten. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. A practical guide. London: Sage Publications. Have, P. ten. (2001). Applied conversation analysis. In: A. McHoul & M. Rapley (red.) How to analyse talk in institutional settings (p. 3-11). Londen, New York: Continuum. Healey, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: a discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research & Development 19(2): p. 169-189. Heap, J. (1997). Conversation analysis methods in researching language and education. In: N. H. Hornberger & D. Corson (red.) Encyclopedia of language and education. Volume 8. Research methods in language and education.. Kluwer Academic Publisher. Heritage, J. & Watson, D. R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In: G. Psathas (red.) Everyday language. Studies in ethnomethodology (p. 123-162). New York: Irvington Publishers. Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (red.) Structures of social action (p. 299-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In: T. v. Dijk (red.) Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. 3. Discourse and dialogue (p. 95-117). Londen: Academic Press. Heritage, J. & Greatbatch, D. (1991). On the institutional character of insitutional talk: the case of news interviews. In: D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (red.) Talk and social structure (p. 93-137). Cambridge UK: Polity Press. Heritage, J. & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemma's of advice: aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers. In: Drew.P. & J. Heritage (red.) Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (p. 259-417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis as institutional talk. In: K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (red.) Handbook of language and social interaction (p. 103-147). Routledge. Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): p. 1538. 238
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Heritage, J. (2005). Cognition in discourse. In: H. t. Molder & J. Potter (red.) Conversation and cognition (p. 184-202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition. New directions for teaching. Urbana: Clearing House on Reading and Communication Skills. Hillocks, G. (1995). Teaching writing as reflective practice. New York/Londen: Teachers College Press. Hindin, A., Cobb Morocco, C., Arwen Mot, E. & Mata Aguilar, C. (2007). More than just a group: teacher collaboration and learning in the workplace. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 13(4): p. 349-376. Hoekstra, A., Beijaard, D., Brekelmans, M. & Korthagen, F. (2004). Informele leeractiviteiten van docenten in de beroepspraktijk. Paper, Onderwijs Researchdagen 2004. http://edu.fss.uu.nl/ord. Hoekstra, A., Brekelmans, M., Beijaard, D. & Korthagen, F. (2009). Experienced teachers' informal learning: learning activities and changes in behavior and cognition. Teaching and Teacher Education 25(5): p. 663-673. Hof, S. van ‘t. (2006). From text to talk. Answers and their uptake in standardised survey interviews. Utrecht: LOT, Netherlands Graduate School of linguistics. Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. White Plains, NY: Longman. Holmes, J., Stubbe, M. & Vine, B. (1999). Constructing professional identity: "Doing power" in policy units. In: S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (red.) Talk, work and institutional order. Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings (p. 351-385). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Holmes, M. (1991). Bringing about change in teachers: rationalistic technology and therapeutic human relations in the subversion of education. Curriculum Inquiry 21(1): p. 65-96. Houtkoop, H. (1987). Establishing agreement. An analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Houtkoop, H. & Koole, T. (2000). Taal in actie. Hoe mensen communiceren. Bussum: Coutinho. Huber, M. T. (2003). Disciplines and the development of a scholarship of teaching and learning. In: R. Blackwell & P. Blackmore (red.) Towards strategic staff development in higher education (p. 55-65). Maidenhead: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. Hui, D. & Russel, D. L. (2007). Understanding innovative professional development for educators through the analysis of intersubjectivity in online collaborative dialogues. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 3(3): p. 25-38. Huisman, M. (2000). Besluitvorming in vergaderingen. Utrecht: LOT. Hutchby, I. (1996). Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hutchby, I. & R.Wooffitt (1998). Conversation Analysis. Principles, practicles and application. Cambridge: Polity Press. Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Hutchins, E. & Klausen, T. (1996). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In: Y. Engström & D. Middleton (red.) Cognition and communication at work (p. 15-34). Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press. James, B., Skillen, J., Percy, A., Tootell, H. & Irvine, H. (2005). From integration to transformation. In: Refereed proceedings of the biannual language and academic skills in higher education 2003 conference, Flinders university (p. 37-47). 239
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In: J. N. Schenkein (red.) Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (p. 219-248). New York: Academic Press. Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In: G. Psathas (red.) Everyday Language. Studies in Ethnomethodology (p. 79-96). New York: Irvington. Jefferson, G. (1983a). On a failed hypothesis: conjunctionals as overlap-vulnarable. Katholieke Universiteit Brabant: Tilburg Papers in language and literature, nr.28. Jefferson, G. (1983b). Notes on a possible metric which provides for a standard maximum silence of approcimately one second in conversation. Katholieke Universiteit Brabant: Tilburg Papers in language and literature, nr.42. Jefferson, G. (1984a). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens 'yeah' and 'mm hm'. Papers in Linguistics 17: p. 1998-216. Jefferson, G. (1984b). On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In: J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (red.) Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (p. 191-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In: G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (red.) Talk and social organization (p. 86-100). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters. Jewett, P. & Goldstein, N. (2008). Catching sight of talk: Glimpses into discourse groups. Teaching and Teacher Education 24: p. 1232-1242. Jucker, A. H. & Smith, S. W. (1996). Explicit and implicit ways of enhancing common ground in conversation. Pragmatics 6(1): p. 1-18. Kagan, D. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition. Review of Educational Research 60: p. 419-469. Kallenberg, A. J., Grijspaarde, L. v. d., Braak, A. t. & Horzen, C. J. v. (2003). Leren (en) doceren in het hoger onderwijs. Utrecht: Lemma. Kam, A. E. & Kruiningen, J. F. (2007). Communicatieve vaardigheden in de universitaire curricula. Onderzoek Van Onderwijs 36(1): p. 10-15. Kane, R., Sandretto, S. & Heath, Ch. (2002). Telling half the story: a critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research 72(2): p. 177-228. Karkäinen, E. (2006). Stance taking in conversation: from subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk.An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 26(6): p. 699-732. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction 7: p. 255-275. Kember, D. & Kwan, K. (2002). Lecturer's approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. In: N. Hativa & P. Goodyear (red.) Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education (p. 219-240). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Khine, M. S. & (red.) (2009). Transformative leaderschip and educational excellence. Learning organizations in the information age. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Kinnel, A. M. (2002). Soliciting client questions in HIV prevention and test counseling. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(3): p. 367-393. Kompf, M., Bond, W. R., Dworet, D. & Boak, R. T. r. (1996). Changing research and practice. Teachers' professionalism, idenitites and knowledge. London: Falmer Press. 240
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Koole, T. & Ten Thije, J. D. (1994). The construction of intercultural discourse. Team discussions of educational advisors. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi. Koole, T. & Berenst, J. (2008). Pupil participation in plenary interaction. In: J. Deen, M. Hayer & T. Koole (red.) Interaction in two multicultural mathematics classrooms. Mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion (p. 615-633). Amsterdam: Aksant. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2005). Practice, theory, and person in life-long professional learning. In: D. Beijaard, P. C. Meijer, G. Morine-Dershimer & H. Tillema (red.) Teacher professional development in changing conditions (p. 79-94). Dordrecht: Springer. Korthagen, F. A. J. & Kessels, P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher 20: p. 4-17. Koschmann, T. (1999). The edge of many circles: making meaning of meaning making. Discourse Processes 27(2): p. 103-117. Koschmann, T. & LeBaron, C. D. (2003). Reconsidering common ground: examining Clark's contribution theory in the OR. In: P. Dourish & K. Schmidts (red.) Proceedings of the eight European conference of computer-supported cooperative work, 14-18 september 2003, Helsinki, Finland (p. Kluwer Academic Publisher. Kosunen, T. & Huusko, J. (2002). Shared and subjective in curriulum making. In: C. Sugrue & Ch. Day (red.) Developing teachers and teaching practice (p. 234-244). London, New York: Routledge Falmer. Kramer, F. L., Padmos, H. & Van Kruiningen, J. F. (2003). Creating a basis for a facultyoriented writing programme. In: L. Björk, G. Bräuer, L. Rienecker & P. Stray Jörgensen (red.) Teaching academic writing in European higher education (p. 185195). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Kreuz, R. J. (1996). The use of verbal irony. Cues and constraints. In: J. Scott Mio & A. N. Katz (red.) Metafor. Implicatoins and aplications (p. 23-38). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kruiningen, J. F. van. (2004). Het communicatieve-vaardigheden-project. Over ecologie, 'chaos' en interactie in universitaire onderwijsvernieuwing. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 72(2): p. 55-66. Kruiningen, J. F. van. & Van de Laar, B. (2004). Bètaplus-project Communicatieve Vaardigheden 2000-2003. Evaluatie en aanbevelingen. Ongepubliceerd. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Kumpulainen, K. & Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: an introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction 9: p. 449-473. Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1966). Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In: Helm.J. (red.) Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society (p. 12-44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. Labov, W. & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse. Psychotherapy as conversation. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press. Lamerichs, J. & Te Molder, H. (2003). Support as an accountable matter. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 70(2): p. 103-119. Lamerichs, J. (2003). Discourse of support: exploring online discussions on depression. Wageningen: Universiteit van Wageningen. Lave, J. (1990). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In: J. W. Stigler, R. A. Schweder & G. Herdt (red.) Cultural psychology (p. 259-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripherial participation. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press. 241
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Lea, M. R. & Stierer, B. (2000). Student writing in higher education. New contexts. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. Leontiev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In: J. V. Wertsch (red.) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (p. 37-71). Armonk, N.Y.: Sharpe. Leppänen, V. (1998). The straightforwardness of advice: advice-giving in interactions between swedisch district nurses and patients. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(2): p. 209-239. Lerner, G. H. (1996a). Finding "face" in the peference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 59(4): p. 303-321. Lerner, G. H. (1996b). On de "semi-permeable character" of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In: E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (red.) Interaction and Grammar (p. 238-276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lieberman, A. & Miller, L. (2001). Teachers caught in the action: professional development that matters. New York: Teachers College Press. Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education 18: p. 917-946. Macbeth, D. (2000). On an actual apparatus for conceptual change. Science Education (84): p. 228-264. Mansvelder-Longayroux, D., Beijaard, D. & Verloop, N. (2002). Het portfolio als reflectieinstrument voor docenten-in-opleiding. Pedagogische Studieën 79(4): p. 269-285. Margolin, I., Ezer, H. & Karton, R. (2000). Constructing a professional community of teacher educators during a curriculum-in-action process. Ongepubliceerd. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Association (New Orleans, april 2000). Margutti, P. (2006). "Are you human beings?" Order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education 17: p. 313346. Marsick, V. J. & Watkins, K. E. (1990). Informal and Incidental learning in the workplace. Londen: Routledge. Maso, I. (1987). Kwalitatief onderzoek. Meppel: Boom. Mazeland, H. (1992). Vraag/antwoord-sequenties. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU. Mazeland, H. (1994). Argumentatie in gesprekken. Een conversatie-analytische aanzet. Tijdschrift Voor Taalbeheersing 16(4): p. 273-295. Mazeland, H. (2003). Inleiding in de conversatieanalyse. Bussem: Coutinho. Mazeland, H.& Berenst, J. (2008). Typifying and sorting. The construction of pupil-idenity in staff meetings. In: J. Deen, M. Hayer & T. Koole (red.) Interaction in two multicultural mathematics classrooms. Mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion (p. 235-266). Amsterdam: Aksant. Mazeland, H. (2009). Positionsexpansionen: Die interaktionale Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungen. In: J. Böcker, S. Dertenkötter & S. Günther (red.) Grammatik im Gespräch: Konstruktionen der Selbst- un Fremdpositionierung (p. 185-212). Berlijn, New York: De Gruyter. McAlpine, L., Weston, C., Beauchamp.J., Wiseman, C. & Beauchamp, C. (1999). Building a metacognitive model of reflection. Higher Education 37: p. 105-131.
242
BIBLIOGRAFIE
McAlpine, L. & Weston, C. (2002). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors' teaching and students' learning. In: N. Hativa & P. Goodyear (red.) Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education (p. 59-78). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. McLeod, S. H. (1992). Writing across the curriculum: an introduction. In: S. H. McLeod & M. Soven (red.) Writing across the curriculum. A guide to developing programmes (p. 1-13). Newbury Park/Londen/New Delhy: Sage Publications. McLeod, S. H., Miraglia, E., Soven, M. & Thaiss, Ch. (2001). WAC for the new millenium. Strategies for continuing writing-across-the-curriculum programs. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English. McLeod, S. H. & Miraglia, E. (2001). Writing across the curriculum in a time of change. In: S. H. McLeod, E. Miraglia, M. Soven & Ch. Thaiss (red.) WAC for the new millenium. Strategies for continuing writing-across-the-curriculum programs (p. 127). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English. Meijer, P. C. (1999). Teachers' practical knowledge. Teaching reading comprehension in seconday education. Leiden: University of Leiden. Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C. & Verloop, N. (2007). A closer look at teachers' individual learning in collaborative settings. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 13(2): p. 145-164. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds. How we use language to think together. London, New York: Routledge. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R. & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal 30(3): p. 359-377. Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 17: p. 33-59. Mercer.N., Wegerif, R. & Dawes, L. (1999). Children's talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal 25(1): p. 95-111. Middleton, D. (1998). Talking work: argument, common knowledge, and improvisation in teamwork. In: Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (red.) Cognition and communication at work (p. 233-256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Molder, H. te & Potter, J. (2005). Conversation and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan and development of talk-in-interaction: an analysis of a small group activity in a japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics 23(3): p. 323-347. Mönnik, J. B. M. (1988). De organisatie van gesprekken. Een pragmatische studie van minimale interaktieve taalvormen. Nijmegen: Universiteit van Nijmegen. Murray, K. & MacDonald, R. (1997). The disjunction between lectureres' conceptions of teaching and their claimed educational practice. Higher Education 33: p. 331-349. Müller, F. E. (1996). Affiliating and disaffiliating with continuers. Prosodic aspects of recipiency. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (red.) Prosody in conversation (p. 131-176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nederlandse Taalunie & Radboud Universiteit (2008). Weglating van het element op de eerste zinsplaats. In: Elektronische ANS (Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst). http://www.let.ru.nl/ans/e-ans/ (downloaddatum: 23-06-2006).
243
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Ochs, E., Taylor, C., Rudolph, D. & Smith, R. (1992). Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes 15: p. 37-72. Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research 62: p. 307-332. Pander Maat, H. (2002). Tekstanalyse. Wat teksten tot teksten maakt. Bussum: Coutinho. Parr, G. B. (2007). Inquiry-based professional learning of Englisch-literature teachers: negotiationg dialogic potential (Unpublished PhD thesis). http://repository.unimelb.edu.au/10187/2132. Pekarek Doehler, S. (2002). Mediation revisited: the interactive organization of mediation on learning environments. Mind, Culture and Activity 9(1): p. 22-42. Penlington, C. (2008). Dialogue as a catalyst for teacher change: a conceptual analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education 24: p. 1304-1316. Pfaff, M. E. (2000). The effects on teacher efficacy of school based collaborative activites structured as professional study groups. Ongepubliceerd. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 2000). Pfeiffer, L. & Featherstone, H. (1997). "Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore": entering the land of public disagreement in learning to teach. Ongepubliceerd. paper, gepresenteerd op Urban Ethnography Forum, maart 1997. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chigace Press. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Ney York: Doubleday. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some featuers of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: Atkinsons.J.M. & J. Heritage (red.) Structures of social action. Studies in Conversation Analysis (p. 57-101). Cambridge, London, New York: Cambridge University Press. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Pursuing a response. In: Atkinsons.J.M. & J. Heritage (red.) Structures of social action. Studies in Conversation Analysis (p. 152-163). Cambridge, London, New York: Cambridge University Press. Pomerantz, A. & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In: T. A. v. Dijk (red.) Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. Volume 2 (p. 64-91). London: Sage Publications. Pomerantz, A. (2005). Using participants' video-stimulated comments to complement analyses of interactional practices. In: H. t. Molder & J. Potter (red.) Conversation and Cognition (p. 93-113). Cambridge: University Press. Ponte, P., Ax, J., D.Beijaard & Wubbels, T. (2004). Teachers' development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education (20): p. 571-588. Potter, J. (1996a). Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: theoretical background. In: J. T. E. Richardson (red.) Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. (p. 125-140). Leicester: BPS Books. Potter, J. (1996b). Representing reality. Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage Publications. Potter, J. (1998). Discursive social psychology: from attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology 9: p. 233-266.
244
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology 67: p. 25-35. Puchta, C. & Potter, J. (2002). Manufacturing individual opinions: Market research focus groups and the discursive psychology of evaluation. Britisch Journal of Social Psychology 41: p. 345-363. Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: implications of new views of cognition. In: B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good & I. F. Goodson (red.) International handbook of teachers and teaching (p. 1223-1296). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about reserach on teacher learning? Educational Researcher 29(1): p. 4-15. Quinlan, K. M. (1999). Commonalities and controversy in context: a study of academic historians' educational beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education 15: p. 447-463. Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68(6): p. 939-967. Raymond, G. & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: owning grandchildren. Language in Society 35: p. 677-705. Rehbein, J. (1977). Komplexes Handeln. Elemente zur Handlungstheorie der Sprache. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler. Resnick.L. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In: L. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (red.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition (p. 1-20). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In: J. Sikula (red.) Handbook of research on teacher education (p. 102-119). New York: Macmillan. Rienecker, L. & Stray Jörgensen, P. (2003). The (im)possibilities in teaching university writing in the Anglo-American tradition when dealing with continental student writers. In: L. Björk, G. Bräuer, L. Rienecker & P. Stray Jörgensen (red.) Teaching academic writing in European higher education (p. 101-113). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking - Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture and Activitiy 1(4): p. 209-229. Rogoff, B. & Chavajay, P. (1995). What's become of research on the cultural basis of cognitive development? American Psychologist 50(10): p. 859-977. Rust, F. O. (1999). Professional conversations: new teachers explore teaching through conversation, story, and narrative. Teaching and Teacher Education 15(4): p. 367380. Rust, F. O. & Orland, L. (2001). Learning the discourse of teaching: conversation as professional development. In: C. M. Clark (red.) Talking shop. Authentic conversation and teacher learning (p. 82-117). New York, London: Teachers College Press. Sacks, H. (1963). Sociological description. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 8: p. 1-16. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): p. 696-735. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation (vol. I, vol. II, edited by G. Jefferson). Oxford: Blackwell.
245
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Sacks, H. (2006). On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In: Drew.P. & J. Heritage (red.) Conversation analysis. Vol. II. Sequence organization (p. 27-44). London: Sage Publications (oorspronkelijke publicatie in: Button, G. & J.R. E. Lee (1987). Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. p. 54-69). Samuelowicz, K. & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education 41: p. 299-325. Sarangi, S. & Roberts, C. (1999). Talk, work and institutional order. Discourse in medical, mediation and managementsettings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Sarangi, S. & Roberts, C. (1999). The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work-related settings. In: S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (red.) Talk, work and institutional order (p. 1-57). Den Haag: Mouton de Gruyter. Saunders, W., Goldenberg, C. & Haman, J. (1992). Instructional conversation beget instructional conversation. Teaching and Teacher Education 8(2): p. 199-218. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70: p. 1057-1095. Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: an exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2): p. 101-114. Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In: L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (red.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition (p. 150-171). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided defence of intersubjectivity in conversation. Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Confirming allusions: toward an empirical account of action. The American Journal of Sociology 12(1): p. 161-216. Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Turn organisation. One intersection of grammar and interaction. In: E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (red.) Interaction and grammar (p. 52-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Schoot, M. v. d. & Mazeland, H. (2005). Probleembeschrijvingen in werkbesprekingen. Taalbeheersing 27(1): p. 1-23. Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. (1995). Intercultural communication. A discourse approach. UK: Blackwel Publishers. Scribner, J. P., Cockrell, K. S., Cockrell, D. H. & Valentine, J. W. (1999). Creating professional communities in schools through organizational learning: an evaluation of a school improvement process. Educational Administration Quarterly 35(1): p. 130-160. Scribner, J. P., Watson, S. T. & Meyers, V. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: a study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly 43(1): p. 67-100. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts; an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis as research methodology. In: K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (red.) Applying conversation analysis (p. 251-268). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Shön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books. Silverman, D. (1998). Qualitative research: meanings or practices? Info Systems 8: p. 3-20.
246
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Singer, E. R. (1996). Espoused teaching paradigms of college faculty. Research in Higher Education 37(6): p. 659-679. Skillen, J., Trivett, N., Meren, M. & Percy, A. (1999). Integrating the instruction of generic and discipline-specific skill into the curriculum: a case study. In: Cornerstones. Proceedings of the 1999 HERDSA conference (p. Skillen, J., Trivett, N. & James, B. (2001). Creating partnerships in supporting student learning: a paradigm shift in learning support. In: P. Little, J. Cornway, K. Cleary, S. Bourke, J. Archer & A. Kingsland (red.) Learning partnerships: proceedings of the 2001 annual HERDSA conference (p. 34-55). Skillen, J. (2005). Teaching academic writing in Australian universities. In: L. GanobscikWilliams (red.) Academic writing in Britain: Theories and practices of an emerging field (p. 37-45) . London: Palgrave Macmillan. Sparks, D. & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1990). Models of staff development. In: W. R. Houston, M. Haberman & J. Sikula (red.) Handbook of research on teacher education. A project of the association of teacher educators (p. 234-250). New York, London: MacMillian Publishing Company. Sribner, J. J., Cockrell, K. S., Cockrell, K. H. & Valentine, J. W. (1999). Creating professional communities in schools through organizational learning. An evaluation of a school improvement process. Educational Administration Quarterly 35(1): p. 130-160. Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area (2005). European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, Helsinki. Stivers, T. (2004). "No no no" and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30(2): p. 260-293. Stivers, T. (2005). Modified repeats: one method for asserting primary rights from second position. Reseach on Language and Social Interaction 38(2): p. 131-158. Stokking, K. (2003). Organiseren van ontwikkeling tussen vraag en aanbod. Notities bij de Bachelor-Master ambities van de Universiteit van Utrecht. Oratie. Utrecht: RU. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Suchman, L. (1996). Constitutiing shared workplaces. In: Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (red.) Communication and cognition at work (p. 35-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sugrue, C. (1997). Student teachers' lay theories and teaching identities: Their implications for professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education 20: p. 213225. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambrige (UK), New York: Cambridge University Press. Swanborn, P. G. (1987). Methoden van sociaal-wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Meppel, Amsterdam: Boom. Swanborn, P. G. (2000). Case-study's. Wat, wanneer en hoe? Amsterdam/Meppel: Boom. Szczepek Reed, B. (2006). Prosodic oriëntation in English conversation. Basingstoke: Pallgrave MacMillian. Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Tannen, D. (1986). That's not what I meant!: How conversational style makes or breakes your relations with others. New York: William Morrow. Tannen, D. (1994). Gender & discourse. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
247
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Tempe Adger, C. T., Hoyle, S. M. & Dickinson, D. (2004). Locating learning in in-service education for preschool teachers. American Educational Research Journal 41(4): p. 867-900. Temple Adger, C. T. (2002). Professional conversation and teacher learning. Educational Researcher 31(9): p. 26-28. Tottie, G. & Hoffman, S. (2006). Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4): p. 283-311. Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers' approaches to teaching. Higher Education 32: p. 77-87. Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J. & Prosser, M. (2000). Sholarship of teaching: a model. Higher Education Reserach & Development 19(2): p. 155-168. Vehviläinen, S. (2001). Evaluative advice in educational counseling. The use of disagreement in the stepwise entry to advice. Research on Language and Social Interaction 34(3): p. 371-398. Vescio, V., Ross, D. & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education 24: p. 80-91. Vorreiter, S. (2003). Turn Continuations: towards a cross-linguistic classification. InList (Interaction and Linguistics Structures: a Pre-Publication Series, Unversity of Freiburg, Münster and Potsdam) 39: p. 1-26. Vygotsky, S. L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambrida, MA: MIT Press. Vygotsky, S. L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Walvoord, B. E. (1992). Getting started. In: S. H. McLeod & M. Soven (red.) Writing across the curriculum. A guide to developing programmes (p. 12-31). Newbury Park/Londen/New Delhy: Sage Publications. Walvoord, B. E. (1997). From conduit to customer: the role of WAC faculty in WAC assessment. In: K. Blake Yancey & B. Huot (red.) Assessing writing across the curriculum. Diverse approaches and practices (p. 15-36). Greenwich, London: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Walvoord, B. E., Lawrence Hunt, L., Dowling, H. F., McMahon, J. D. & (red.) (1997). In the long run. A study of faculty in three writing-across-the-curriculum programs. Urbana: NCTE. Waring, H. Z. (2002). Displaying substantive recipiency in a seminar discussion. Reseach on Language and Social Interaction 35(4): p. 453-479. Waring, H. Z. (2007). The multi-functionality of accounts in advice giving. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(3): p. 367-399. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N. & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction 9: p. 493-516. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: a proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education 5: p. 1-37. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: CUP. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and idenitiy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wester, F. (1991). Strategieën voor kwalitatief onderzoek. Muiderberg: Coutinho.
248
BIBLIOGRAFIE
Wester, F. (1995). Inhoudsanalyse als kwalitatief-interpreterende werkwijze. In: H. Hüttner, K. Renckstorf & F. Wester (red.) Onderzoekstypen in de communicatiewetenschap (p. 624-649). Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum. Wilson, S. M. & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: an examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education 24: p. 173-209. Wouden, T. van der (2001). Partikels. http://www.let.rug.nl/~vdwouden/docs/nt2001.doc. (Downloaddatum: 13-05-2006). Zellermayer, M. (2001). Resistance as a catalyst in teachers' professional development. In: C. M. Clark (red.) Talking shop. Authentic conversation and teacher learning (p. 40-63). New York: Teachers College Press. Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M. J., Koehler, J. & Eberhart, J. (2008). Conditions for collaborative knowledge construction of inservice science teachers in problembased professional development. Paper presented at the 2008 International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching . Ongepubliceerd.
249
